382
Converg
other than those contained within the
fover
of his gardew lease and the sirequent Governinout Notification of 1874.
• As stated in his printed evidence, he consider himself a sort of tenant ia – perpetivity,
Was
whereas we believe that this
• precisely what the Government
of
fre
: Sir Anthuer Remedy took care should not misconceive himself to be.
If allt. Humphreys 's ideas
of his position ar correct, there was 110 reason
why he and
are
the rest of the garden lot owners should
not originally, have received 75 year
leases.
its tve
- gather tha
144 years
From the evidence before its
ཝཱ,
the ain
of of the shorter temures was to reserve to the Governcunt, at the
expirate
tion of this period, the absolute right to re-enter into possession without
any compensation to tenants as
specified
in
in the Government Notification of Frboccary; 187/4, in the event of the development of the Colony and the course- of public improveuunf: necessitating that re-entry.
14.
As to any
ucoral claw which
M = Humphreys or the Cardew lot-ormers may deem themselves to have on the, consideration of Coverument on account of. the moneys they have expended in the levelling and improvewoud of their grounds,
amply
tve are
of opinion that such are
met by the low additional premiums and Crown Reut at which we have purposely :
approved the propoved new building has holds
15.
In
-support of our views, and in order that the Government may form
some idea of the greatly
of the greatly increased value that Kowloon building sites would n
if secured
secured to the holders by
acquire - if
Rome
permanent
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.